A federal appeals court has dealt a significant blow to E. Jean Carroll's $83 million defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump, temporarily halting the payment until the Supreme Court weighs in. The ruling, which was met with little resistance from Carroll's team, is a major setback for the writer who accused Trump of defaming her in a 2019 book. The appeals court's decision effectively pauses the payment, which was set to be made to Carroll as part of a settlement reached in June 2022. The delay is a significant development in the ongoing saga, which has seen Trump's lawyers attempt to appeal the original ruling as well as the subsequent settlement. Carroll's team had initially agreed to the pause as long as certain conditions were met, including the Supreme Court's review of the case. The pause is a temporary reprieve for Trump, who has been locked in a bitter battle with Carroll over the defamation allegations. The appeals court's decision is a reminder that the legal system is not always a straightforward or speedy process, and that even the most high-profile cases can be subject to lengthy delays and appeals. In the meantime, Carroll's lawyers have vowed to continue fighting for their client's rights, and the Supreme Court's review of the case is expected to be a closely watched development in the coming months. The case has sparked intense debate over the limits of free speech and the responsibilities of public figures, and the Supreme Court's decision is likely to have significant implications for future defamation cases. As the legal battle continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the outcome of this case will have far-reaching consequences for the world of politics and the media.
The appeals court's decision is a significant development in the ongoing saga, which has seen Trump's lawyers attempt to appeal the original ruling as well as the subsequent settlement. Carroll's team had initially agreed to the pause as long as certain conditions were met, including the Supreme Court's review of the case. The pause is a temporary reprieve for Trump, who has been locked in a bitter battle with Carroll over the defamation allegations. The appeals court's decision is a reminder that the legal system is not always a straightforward or speedy process, and that even the most high-profile cases can be subject to lengthy delays and appeals. In the meantime, Carroll's lawyers have vowed to continue fighting for their client's rights, and the Supreme Court's review of the case is expected to be a closely watched development in the coming months. The case has sparked intense debate over the limits of free speech and the responsibilities of public figures, and the Supreme Court's decision is likely to have significant implications for future defamation cases. As the legal battle continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the outcome of this case will have far-reaching consequences for the world of politics and the media.
About Elena Rostova
Political Correspondent
Senior Political Analyst covering federal policy and legislative tracking. Elena spent 10 years inside the Beltway before joining DailyBorg to focus on autonomous fact-checking.
View Full Profile & Work →Continue Briefing
Additional intelligence reports from the network
